Thomas Germain's discussions

thomasgermain
Thomas Germain
thomasgermain
I'm a Senior Reporter at Gizmodo covering privacy, AI, and life on the internet. I read the terms of service so you don't have to. Have a tip? Reach out by email, or ask for my Signal contact info.

This isn’t some lament about how the children are failing us. We’re talking about the consequences of the changing ways we use the internet.” Read more

Yeah interesting, I don’t personally have this problem but a microwave with good shielding isn’t going to leak at all? I assume it wouldn’t take much but I’m no physicist
Read more

I’m not calling anyone 4's or 8's. I’m describing an algorithm which assigns you a number and explaining how that number is used. There are probably hundreds of thousands of people who try to game the algorithms one way or another, so seems like it’s worth exploring a subject so many people care about. Would you Read more

Like the article says, I talked to about a dozen people across the gender spectrum and they all had similar feelings.
Read more

Pretty harsh, you’re making a bunch of assumptions here that aren’t accurate.
Read more

We can ban people, but you still have an account so you’re not banned. I can tell you there’s no such thing as a shadowban in our comments, there’s no setting for that. If you post a bunch of off putting or rude comments though our system will automatically flag your posts for review... did you say something weird?
Read more

You didn’t find it because you didn’t look. Gizmodo wrote 10000 articles about it, and links to our pieces on Elon’s “Twitter Files” are linked in this article.  Read more

Yup, we will. The comments section on Gizmodo is not the public square. Go out on the street and be racist or transphobic if you want, that’s your right, but if you stout spouting hateful nonsense on our site you’re banned. Read more

Good luck! If you figure out how to do that please let the entire media business know, our families are starving
Read more

I didn’t say it’s the most affordable, because it’s not. I said it’s the easiest, and maybe the best value. We didn’t go deeper into the mic because it was a review of the platform, not the product, but a new podcaster will have a much easier time than buying standalone mics, hooking them up to garage band, and then Read more

That’s a good question! I don’t think it inherently makes the content invalid. But if nothing else, it’s important from the perspective of vetting the information. If something was written by an expert, maybe you would assume it’s true. If an AI wrote it, maybe you take it with a grain of salt. Read more

Cherry picking is a bizarre way to describe documenting a phenomenon. This isn’t an article about how the entire world reacted to the news, obviously some people feel positive or neutral about it. 
Read more

The reason to care is precisely the fact that you don’t have to open a new tab. When you’re talking about hundreds of millions of people, it makes a big difference. This sticks a chatbot in people’s faces when they aren’t going out of their way to find it. That will expose it to far more people.
Read more

I believe the FLSA allows for state-specific regulation, but there are standards state can’t cross, i.e. hard labor. I expect that’s why the Iowa bill specifically says kids can’t lift things more than 50 pounds Read more

“You’re dumb because you use the most common definition of a word instead of my extremely pedantic preference.” -pkadare, Commissioner of the Slideshow Police Read more

You’re missing the point. If racism is built into a tool in ways that are hard to detect, then it can and probably will slip in when people aren’t asking for it. Read more